Here's an example of a personality report. Bars show the percentage of people who score less than the candidate. Green bars mean the score is above average. Orange means slightly below average. Red is far below average.
Hover over any score for more information or click on one to reveal additional details.
Summarizes all available information. When making an acceptance decision, we recommend focusing mostly on a person's overall score.
Personality-based evidence should always be combined with evidence from other sources (e.g., interviews, reference checks, credit checks) before making a final acceptance decision.
Paying rent without hassles. People who score above average are likely to have fewer late or missed payments than people who score below average.
Desire to maintain good standing on rent and other payments, even when doing so requires personal sacrifice. People who score above average are more motivated to avoid owing money for unpaid rent compared to people who score below average. They are also less likely to make excuses for late or missed payments.
Paying on time without constant reminders from the landlord/manager. People who score above average are likely to require fewer collection efforts from the landlord/manager than people who score below average. They are also likely to have fewer bounced checks compared to people who score below average.
Living in the unit without causing damage. People who score above average are less likely to generate damage-related costs than are people who score below average.
Respect toward rental properties. Compared to people who score below average, people who score above average are more likely to:
Promptly reporting damage before it escalates. People who are above average are more likely to report damage in a timely fashion than people who are below average.
Admitting to damages and agreeing to pay for or fix them. People who score above average are more likely to admit being responsible for damages they caused than are people who score below average.
Risk for severe cluttering of the person's home, to the point that it is no longer able to function as a viable living space.
People are either classified as "low risk", "modest risk" or "enhanced risk". People with modest and enhanced risk have a low but non-trivial chance of hoarding at some point in their lives.
Being a good neighbor. People who score above average are more likely to get along with neighbors and less likely to bother neighbors compared to people who score below average.
Politeness, helpfulness, and cooperation when interacting with neighbors. People who score higher than average are likely to be more personable with neighbors than are people who score below average.
Caring about bothering neighbors. People who score above average are more likely than people who score below average to avoid annoying behaviors, such as:
Maintaining a healthy professional relationship with the landlord/manager. People who score above average are likely to have more positive interactions and fewer negative interactions with the landlord/manager compared to people who score below average.
Being truthful and fair-minded. People who score above average are likely to display greater integrity than people who score below average.
Setting modest expectations as opposed to acting entitled. Problems from unreasonable expectations are more likely to arise from people who score below average than from people who score above average. Common problems may include:
Being pleasant and welcoming when interacting with the landlord/manager. People who score above average are likely to be more receptive and less abrasive toward the landlord/manager than are people who score below average.
Helpfulness when cooperation is required, such as during repairs, viewings, and attempts to contact the tenant. People who score above average are likely to be more responsive and flexible than people who score below average.
Inclination to stay calm rather than say things in anger. Angry outbursts toward the landlord/manager are more likely to occur from people who score below average compared to those who score above average.
Household maintenance activities. People who score above average are likely to do a better job managing routine household tasks than someone who scores below average.
Keeping surroundings clean. Includes living spaces, yards, balconies, and common areas. People who score above average are likely to keep surroundings more tidy than people who score below average.
Conserving utilities. People who score above average are more likely to take care when using utilities than are people who are below average. Reasons may include a sense of responsibility for the environment, a desire to be economical, or guilt over abusing landlord-paid utilities.
Exerting extra efforts that are not required by the lease but that promote a positive living environment. People who score above average are more likely to do extras than people who score below average. Extras include behaviors such as:
Living in a unit without engaging in secretive or illegal behaviors. People who score above average are more likely to respect the need to obtain permission and less likely to break laws or abuse substances than people who score below average.
Respecting the need to obtain the landlord/manager's permission before engaging in restricted activities. Activities may include:
People who score above average are less likely to engage in restricted activities without permission compared to people who score below average.
Distaste for activities involving personal gain at the expense of others. Offences are more likely to arise from people who score below average than from those who score above average. Common offences include:
Note that few people who score below average will ultimately decide to steal or commit fraud as a tenant (e.g., 1 in 5 people).
Numbers given in the above paragraph are for illustrative purposes only.
Degree to which a person avoids alcohol and drugs. Because many people who drink or do occasional drugs live very normal and healthy lives, low sobriety scores may not necessarily indicate a problem. However, low scores do put a person at increased risk for developing problems.
Moving out without causing hassles. People who score above average are more likely to have a smooth moving-out experience compared to people who score below average.
Length of time the person expects to live in the accommodation.
Likelihood of leaving the unit appropriately clean when moving out. People who score above average are likely to leave the unit cleaner than people who score below average. Includes:
Vacating without resistance if the person is ever evicted. People who score above average are more likely to leave without resisting compared to people who score below average.
Note that few people who score below average will ultimately refuse to vacate if evicted (e.g., 1 in 5 people).
Numbers given in the above paragraph are for illustrative purposes only.
Degree to which a person finds revenge repulsive as opposed to acceptable. When people are evicted, revenge behaviors are more likely to occur from those who score below average compared to people who score above average.
Note that few people who score below average will ultimately decide to take revenge if evicted (e.g., 1 in 5 people).
Numbers given in the above paragraph are for illustrative purposes only.
Candidness reflects how a person performed on our lie detector scale. The scale detects the degree to which a candidate attempted to present himself/herself as a desirable tenant.
A measure of careful responding. Values below .7 indicate that the candidate may have responded randomly to some items. Added caution is warranted in interpreting results.
Total number of minutes the candidate spent responding, not counting long breaks.